Register Your Cart

Media about us

TheMikhailovskyBallet, LaFillemalgardée


TheMikhailovskyBallet, LaFillemalgardée

It is over half a century since Russia first welcomed Frederick Ashtons La Fille mal gardée when it arrived as part of the repertory in The Royal Ballets inaugural visit to Leningrad with a performance held during the White Nights, on 15 June 1961, the year following its premiere in London. Ashton recalled that the ballet was received by the Russians as a triumph. They just wouldnt stop clapping, he told a friend on his return home.

Ashton hated the temporary loss of freedom required of him as a visitor to the Soviet Union and so this brief tour aside the Iron Curtain was to remain firmly closed until his death, which came midway through the years of perestroika, but he greatly admired all things Russian in the heritage of his chosen art. He was famously weaned onto ballet by the inspiration of seeing Anna Pavlova dance in Peru (when Ashton was aged 13) and it was another Mariinsky ballerina, Tamara Karsavina, who convinced him to make La Fille mal gardée and whose precise memories of the ribbon dance and the when Im married mime sequence are exactly transposed into Ashtons production. Other Russian ballerinas, such as Vera Volkova, were close friends to whom Ashton would often turn for advice.

Pavlova, Karsavina and Volkova were each born in St Petersburg, the city known as Leningrad during the era of the Soviet Union where his La Fille mal gardée was received so rapturously, both then and now: for this idyllic ballet has just returned and largely in the same state that it was first seen in that city, over 50 years ago. This is all thanks to the initiative and energy of the Mikhailovsky Theatres principal ballet master, Mikhail Messerer, who has stripped Ashtons ballet back to the original staging that is still visible in a 1965 film featuring the original cast.

Messerers intention was to eradicate all the embellishments subsequently added to various revivals of the ballet both by Ashton himself and by Alexander Grant on whom the role of Alain was created, and to whom Ashton bequeathed ownership of the rights to La Fille mal gardée. This laudable intention was largely achieved on the first two nights, although rather undermined by the many alterations made to the role of the Widow Simone by the guest artist cast to play her at the final performance, more of which anon.

When Grant passed away in 2011, the rights transferred to his partner of over 50 years, Jean-Pierre Gasquet, who came to the Mikhailovsky Theatre to help Messerer and his staff mount this revived staging along with Birmingham Royal Ballets Michael OHare (brother of Kevin, the Royal Ballets director) and the conductor, Phillip Ellis. Together and in very little time they have achieved a superb job.

While not all of the individual characterisations may have hit the right mark, the company overall has absorbed the special characteristics of Ashtons English style in uniform mannered, lyrical, lightness of movement, emphasising the plastic potential of the upper body. All of this could be seen very effectively in the assorted dancing of the farmhands and village girls throughout the ballet. The biggest change from the work as it is seen at The Royal Ballet (where it returns in April/May 2015) and BRB is that the Mikhailovsky production spreads over three Acts, placing an interval where there is just a front-of-curtain transition between the two scenes of Act 1. Personally, I think that this more even distribution of the action over three acts is preferable.

I saw all three performances on successive nights in this first run at the Mikhailovsky Theatre (where it returns for a further five performances in May) although one might be forgiven for thinking that only the final show mattered given all the attention that was devoted to Nikolai Tsiskaridzes debut as the Widow Simone. Few Russian critics appeared to have been present at the premiere, which is a pity, since for me it was marginally the best of the three shows, entirely due to the excellent debuts in the romantic roles by two young Mikhailovsky dancers, Anastasia Soboleva (20) as Lise and Victor Lebedev (22) as Colas.

Soboleva is a real find. Still only a second soloist at the Mikhailovsky, she caught the character of Lise beautifully and invested the role with a rich mix of charm and wilfulness, backed by steely technique. Her rendition of the aforementioned mime sequence was adorable. It was not exactly Sobolevas debut in the role since she danced Lise on the Bolshois main stage (in Gorskys choreography) as a 16 year-old at the Moscow State Choreography Academy in November 2009.

Lebedev portrays a coltish, whimsical, yet confident Colas, as well as being another excellent technician, possessing a light, high jump and fast, accurate turns that were most effective in the variation of the picnic pas de deux. He has boyish good looks reminiscent of a young Roberto Bolle and extra long legs. The one weak spot that needs strengthening lies in some aspects of his partnering, notably in the three big lifts, each of which was a struggle to achieve (although to the credit of his determined concentration he just about managed them all).

Another pair took the leading roles on both subsequent nights (despite rumours beforehand that Ivan Vasiliev might appear in one of the shows). Ivan Zaytsev was rather more secure in his lifting but lacked the charisma and lightness of Lebedev and while the pas de deux were thus stronger, his variations were less attractive. His Lise was Angelina Vorontsova, the ballerina who moved to the Bolshoi following the arrest of her then boyfriend, Pavel Dmitrichenko, now serving time for his involvement in the acid attack on the Bolshois artistic director, Sergei Filin.

Vorontsova is now a Principal at the Mikhailovsky and she exudes the confidence of a sunny disposition that works well in this ballet, aligned to a formidable all-around technique that made her solos particularly special. She has superb balance, which enhanced all the important pauses in her variation and enabled seamless turning in the maypole dance. Together with Zaytsev, she was more comfortable with Ashtons fiendish Act 1 ribbonology than the opening night pair had been. However, for all that this was a fine and very promising debut, her characterisation of Lise seemed to be a rather one-size-fits-all portrayal of the feisty comic ballet heroine: on another day the same outlook would have equally suited Swanilda in Coppélia. It all seemed just a little too pert without the subtle variations of personality invested in the role by Soboleva.

The principal comic roles of the Widow Simone and Alain, the simpleton son of a widowed wealthy vineyard owner whom both single parents intend to be Lises betrothed were played by a different performer on all three nights. Ironically, in each case it was a little like Goldilocks and her three bears: one was too much, one too understated while the third was just about right!

The first Alain, Denis Tolmachov, was undeniably funny, looking more like Harpo Marx than Harpo Marx. But, Alain is supposed to be simple and eccentrically obsessive (hence his adoration of the red umbrella). He is daft but not an idiot, and in Tolmachovs reading he was positively certifiable! The Alain of the second-cast, Konstantin Kilinchuk, was much more understated and for a purist perhaps simply too tall for the role. Alexey Kuznetsov captured the hapless Alain to the best effect at the third performance, emphasising all the endearing traits with a near-perfect pitch.

Unsurprisingly, the best of the widows came in the performance from the English guest as BRBs Michael OHare showed the great benefit of experience and understanding, with comic timing that was excellent but subtle. His clog dance was perfectly on the beat, contained the full range of steps and was by some considerable margin the best of the three efforts (but then it is perhaps not surprising that Lancashire clogs are somewhat alien to Russian dancers). Roman Petukhov in the second cast was the more undersold Simone, but still possessed all the right ingredients for a successful portrayal, being far more faithful to the ideal of Stanley Holden in the original cast and certainly much closer to OHares portrayal than that of the third-cast Simone.

What appears odd about Tsiskaridzes performance as Widow Simone is that it ran completely contrary to the declared intention of paring the choreography back to Ashtons original cast, as seen in the 1965 film. Back in 1959, Holden had replaced Robert Helpmann after a few rehearsals, the latter deciding that it was just not for him. Ashtons biographer, Julie Kavanagh, records the choreographer as saying to Holden: Im glad youre doing never camp it up. He is also quoted as saying that during the lovers final, beautiful pas de deux, Helpmann would probably have been knitting or something. Ashton has been dead for 25 years but I suspect that his fears for Helpmanns portrayal of this travesti role would have been fully articulated in Tsiskaridzes scene-stealing efforts. He may not have knitted in the pas de deux but his energetic comic game of patience at the side table certainly drew the eye away from the farmhands stick dance! If he was onstage, he was doing something and since this is Nikolai Tsiskaridze in Russia you can bet that the audience was watching him. It made it far less La Fille mal gardée and much more La Mère qui garde.

Tsiskaridzes Widow Simone was clearly a generation younger that we are used to seeing. No grotesquely bent back or grey hair here, but stiff shoulders, alert bosoms and dark, brooding good looks. Given that a liaison between Alains father, Thomas, and Simone is the sub-text of their offsprings proposed nuptials, I think the old vineyard-owner was onto a good thing (although he might have got a bit of a surprise come the wedding night)! When Tsiskaridze comes to do the double take in the mirror on leaving the farmhouse, he does so with an arabesque (although this is not unique since I recall Will Tuckett doing something similar with The Royal Ballet). If there was any opportunity to add something extra (even sweeping down the farmhouses external staircase) then Tsiskaridze took it, probably adding more embellishments than a generations worth of revivals in the modern era and thus rather defeating the object of the whole exercise! He took to the clog dance with aplomb even if not necessarily in the right combination of steps or in time with the music.

The best aspect of this third performance came in the very obvious affection that existed between Tsiskaridzes Simone and his daughter, Lise. Tsiskaridze is Vorontsovas mentor and he was her coach at the Bolshoi (where Filins refusal to cast Vorontsova as Odette was a key part of the story that has led to Dmitrichenkos incarceration). This filial closeness translates onto the stage in La Fille mal gardée in a way that is possibly unique it could only be replicated, I guess, by a man playing Simone alongside his actual daughter and the genuine intimacy of their relationship was evocatively revealed in this inspired aspect of their casting. Some of Tsiskaridzes extras reflected this closeness, especially in Simones overt attachment to Lise and in the theatrical asides revealing a contemptuous attitude towards Alain. Although I found the aggrandisement of the role to be at odds with both Ashtons and this revivals intentions, it is also true to say that Tsiskaridzes embellishments enhanced the widows loving but watchful relationship with her daughter, effectively stretching it out in both directions.

The dancers of the Mikhailovsky Ballet acquitted themselves excellently not only in their assimilation of the Ashton style but also in performing the collection of English dances that litter the corps de ballets work, from Morris to Maypole and from music hall to pantomime. They managed superbly. Much credit should also go to Philip Ellis who took the tempii, especially of Acts 1 and 2, at a fair gallop and the orchestra of the Mariinsky Theatre responded to this robust pace with alacrity. The acoustics in this small and ornately elegant theatre are excellent.

The Russian audience was slow to appreciate the ballet on its first night and some of the comedy in the early scenes fell flat. The comedy dance of the cockerel (Alexander Gavrish) and his hens hardly raised a chuckle. But it was the arrival of the most charming long-maned, caramel-coloured miniature pony at the end of Act 1 (to transport the Widow and her daughter to the picnic) that deservedly broke the ice. From that moment on, and over three performances, the audience was in thrall to the bucolic genius of Ashtons production with as many curtain calls at the premiere as I can recall witnessing for a very long time.

Although Ashton made elaborate arrangements in his will for bequeathing each of his ballets, he did not hold out much belief that they would last long after his passing, and given his love of all things connected to the ballet in St Petersburg, delicious irony exists in the fact that more than 25 years after his death, two of his five full-length ballets should receive their premieres as part of the repertory of the two main indigenous companies of that city on successive Thursdays. For just one week after this triumphant Mikhailovsky opening of La Fille mal gardée, the Mariinsky Ballet also premiered to great acclaim his ballet, Sylvia, as revived by Christopher Newton and Monica Mason and staged by Susan Jones of ABT. No wonder that at the Mikhailovsky Theatre, Ashtons statuesque caricature on Osbert Lancasters front cloth for La Fille mal gardée seemed to be wearing a satisfied smile!

Graham Watts,



1.1.    This User Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement) defines the procedure for accessing the website of the St. Petersburg State Funded Cultural Institution, the St. Petersburg Mussorgsky State Academic Opera and Ballet Theatre Mikhailovsky Theatre (hereinafter referred to as the Mikhailovsky Theatre) located at the domain

1.2. This Agreement regulates the relationship between the Mikhailovsky Theatre and the users of this website.


2.1. For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms indicated below shall have the following meaning:

2.1.2. Mikhailovsky Theatre Site Administrators those employees authorized to manage the website, acting on behalf of the Mikhailovsky Theatre.

2.1.3. User of the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site (hereinafter the User) a person having access to and using the website via the Internet.

2.1.4. Site the Mikhailovsky Theatre website located at the domain

2.1.5. Content of the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site the protected results of intellectual activity, including extracts from audiovisual productions, their names, forewords, annotations, articles, illustrations and covers, with or without text, graphic, textual, photographic, derived, composite, and other works, user interfaces, visual interfaces, logos, and also the design, structure, selection, coordination, external appearance, general style, and placement of the Content making up the Site and other intellectual property whether together and/or separately contained in the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site and the Personal Area, from where it is then possible to purchase Mikhailovsky Theatre tickets.


3.1. The subject of this Agreement is the provision to the User of access to the services available on the Site.

3.1.1. The Mikhailovsky Theatre Site shall provide the following services to the User:

- access to information about the Mikhailovsky Theatre and information about how to purchase tickets

- purchase of electronic tickets

- discounts, promotions, concessions, and special offers

- receipt of information about Theatre news and events, including via news and information distribution services (email, phone, text message)

- access to electronic content, with the right to view such content

- access to search and navigation tools

- the opportunity to post messages and comments

- other services provided through the pages of the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site

3.2. This Agreement covers all services existing (or functioning) at the present time on the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site, and any subsequent modifications to them and additional services which may appear in the future.

3.2. Access to the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site shall be provided free of charge.

3.3. This Agreement is a public offer. In obtaining access to the Site, the User shall be deemed to have opted in to this Agreement.

3.4. Use of the materials and services on the Site shall be governed by the provisions of current Russian Federation legislation.


4.1. The Mikhailovsky Theatre Site Administrators shall have the right:

4.1.1. To change the rules for use of the Site and to change the Content of the Site. Changes to usage rules shall enter into force from the moment the new version of the Agreement is published on the Site.

4.2. The User shall have the right:

4.2.1. User registration on the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site shall be for the purpose of identifying the User in order to provide Site services, distribute information and news (by email, post, telephone, text message, or other means), and to obtain feedback and a record of the provision of concessions, discounts, special offers, and promotions.

4.2.2. To use all of the services available on the Site.

4.2.3. To ask any questions relating to the information presented on the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site.

4.2.4. To use the Site solely for the purposes and in the manner provided for by this Agreement and not prohibited by Russian Federation legislation.

4.3. The User shall:

4.3.2. Take no action which may be considered to be in breach of the normal functioning of the Site.

4.3.3. Avoid any actions which may result in a breach of confidentiality with regard to information protected by Russian Federation legislation.

4.4. The User may not:

4.4.1. Use any device, program, procedure, algorithm or method, automated devices, or similar manual processes in order to access, acquire, copy, or track the Content of the Site.

4.4.3. Circumvent in any way the navigational structure of the Site in order to obtain or attempt to obtain any information, documents, or material by any means which are expressly not provided by the Site services;

4.4.4. Breach the security or authentication systems of the Site or any network associated with the Site. Carry out reverse searches, track, or attempt to track any information about any other User of the Site.


5.1. The Site and the Content contained therein belong to and are managed by the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site Administrators.

5.2. The Content of the Site may not be published, reproduced, transferred, or distributed by any means, nor posted on the worldwide networks of the Internet without the written consent of the Site Administrators.

5.5. The User shall be personally responsible for the confidentiality of the information in his/her account, including his/her password, and for all activity, without exception, which is carried out on behalf of the User of the account.

5.6. The User must immediately notify the Site Administrators of any unauthorized use of his/her account or password, or of any other breach of the security system.


6.1. Losses which the User may suffer in the event of a deliberate or negligent breach of any provision of this Agreement, or as a consequence of unauthorized access to the communications of any other User, shall not be reimbursed by the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site Administrators.

6.2. The Mikhailovsky Theatre Site Administrators shall not be liable for:

6.2.1. Delays or malfunctions in the process of carrying out operations arising as a result of force majeure circumstances, nor for any faults in the telecommunications, computer, electronic, or other related systems.

6.2.2. The actions of banking, transfer, and payment systems, nor for delays connected with their operation.

6.2.3. Improper functioning of the Site in cases where the User does not have the technical equipment required for its use, nor do the Administrators accept any obligation to provide Users with such equipment.


7.1. The Mikhailovsky Theatre Site Administrators shall have the right to terminate and/or block access to the Site, without prior notice to the User, if the User has breached this Agreement or the terms of use of the Site contained in other documents, or in the event of the Site ceasing to function, or due to technical glitches or problems.

7.2. The Site Administrators shall not be liable to the User or third parties for termination of access to the Site in the event of a breach by the User of any of the provisions of this Agreement or any other document containing the terms of use of this Site.

7.3. The Site Administrators shall have the right to disclose any information about the User as may be necessary for the execution of the provisions of current legislation or judicial rulings.


8.1. In the event of any disagreements or disputes arising between the Parties to this Agreement, a mandatory condition before resorting to the courts is that a claim should be submitted (a written proposal for voluntary resolution of the dispute).

8.2. The recipient of the claim shall, within 30 calendar days of receipt, notify the claimant in writing of the results of consideration of the claim.

8.3. If it is not possible to settle the dispute by voluntary means, either Party may apply to the courts for protection of their rights as provided for under current Russian Federation legislation.


9.1. In opting in to this Agreement and leaving his/her information on the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site by completing the registration form, the User:

9.1.1. Consents to the processing of the following personal information: full name; date of birth; telephone number; email address; payment details (if the service is used to purchase electronic tickets to the Mikhailovsky Theatre);

9.1.2. Confirms that this personal information belongs to him/her personally;

9.1.3. Gives the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site Administrators the right to carry out, without limit in time, the following actions (operations) with his/her personal information:

- collection and accumulation

- storage for an unlimited period of time (indefinitely) from the moment that the information is provided until it is recalled by the User by means of an application to the Site Administrators

- clarification (renewal, modification)

- destruction

9.2. The User's personal information shall be processed in accordance with Article 6.1.5 of Federal Law No. 152-FZ dated 27.07.2006 On Personal Information, solely for the purposes of performing the obligations accepted by the Mikhailovsky Theatre Site Administrators under this Agreement with respect to the User, including those indicated in clause 3.1.1 of this Agreement.

9.3. The User accepts and confirms that all of the provisions of this Agreement and the terms of processing his/her personal information are understood by him/her, and expresses his/her consent with the terms of processing his/her personal information without reservation or limitation. The Users consent to the processing of his/her personal information is specific, informed, and conscious.